DIOCESE OF
Name of Publisher: McGraw
Hill (
Subject Area: Science
Title of Textbook or Series:
McGraw Hill Science
Grade Levels: K – 5 Copyright: 2000 Edition:
RATING KEY: 4-Superior
3-Good 2-Fair 1-Poor
0-Feature Not Present
NA- Not Applicable
OVERVIEW:
A listing of program resources is available by visiting the
publisher’s website: www.mhschool.com/science.
CONTENT
A. ALIGNMENT WITH
CURRICULUM REQUIREMENTS RATING: 3.3
Content
must align with the diocesan standards.
Comments: Curriculum aligns with Diocesan standards.
B. LEVEL OF
TREATMENT RATING: 3.7
The level
of complexity or difficulty of content must be appropriate for the standards,
grade level, and student abilities.
Comments: Age appropriate at all levels.
C. EXPERTISE
FOR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT RATING: 3.7
Expertise in the content area and in
education of the intended students must be reflected in the authors, reviewers,
and sources.
Comments: National Geographic co-authored the program.
D. ACCURACY
OF CONTENT RATING: 3.8
Content
must be accurate in historical context and contemporary facts and concepts.
Comments: Accuracy is excellent.
E. CURRENTNESS OF CONTENT RATING: 3.9
Content must be up-to-date for
the academic discipline and the context in which the content is presented.
Comments:
F. AUTHENTICITY OF CONTENT RATING: 3.8
Content
should include problem-centered connections to life in a context that is
meaningful to the ` students.
Comments:
G. MULTICULTURAL
REPRESENTATION RATING: 3.0
Portrayal of gender, ethnicity, age,
work situations, and social groups must include
multicultural fairness and advocacy.
Comments: “Cultural perspective” sections incorporated.
H. HUMANITY
AND COMPASSION RATING: 3.0
Portrayal of the appropriate
care and treatment of people and animals must include compassion, sympathy, and
consideration of their needs.
Comments: Correlates to Christian values.
TOTAL CONTENT RATING: 3.4
PRESENTATION
A. COMPREHENSIVENESS
OF STUDENT AND TEACHER RESOURCES RATING: 3.7
Resources must be complete
enough to address the targeted learning outcomes without requiring the teacher
to prepare additional teaching materials for the course.
STUDENT
RESOURCES Individual
Rating: 3.7
TEACHER
RESOURCES Individual
Rating: 3.7
B. ALIGNMENT
OF INSTRUCTIONAL COMPONENTS RATING: 3.8
All components of the
instructional package must align with each other, as well as with the
curriculum.
Comments:
Correlates with McGraw Hill
C. ORGANIZATION
OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS RATING: 3.7
The structure and format of the materials
must have enough order and clarity to allow students and teachers to access
content and explicitly identify ideas and sequences.
Comments: Easily accessible materials.
D. READABILITY
OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS RATING: 3.0
Narrative
and visuals should engage students in reading or listening.
Comments: On grade level; vocabulary in context printed in blue.
E. PACING
OF CONTENT RATING: 4.0
The amount of content presented
at one time or the pace at which it is presented must be of a size or rate that
allows students to perceive and understand it
Comments: Good; inquiry learning activities extend daily pacing.
F. EASE OF
USE OF MATERIALS RATING: 3.5
Both print and other media formats
of instructional materials must be easy to use and replace and be durable
enough for multiple uses over time.
LEARNING
A. MOTIVATIONAL
STRATEGIES RATING: 3.7
Instructional
materials must include features to maintain learner motivation.
Comments: Various ability level suggestions throughout chapters.
B. TEACHING
A FEW “BIG IDEAS” RATING: 4.0
Instructional
materials should thoroughly teach a few important ideas, concepts, or themes.
Comments: Material is thoroughly presented.
C. EXPLICIT
INSTRUCTION RATING: 3.7 Instructional
materials must contain clear statements of information and outcomes.
Comments: Information is clearly presented.
D. GUIDANCE
AND SUPPORT RATING: 3.6
Instructional materials must
include guidance and support to help students safely and successfully become
more independent learners and thinkers.
Comments: Pupil addition on audiotape; formatting features for struggling readers; “Words to Know” cards for every chapter.
E. ACTIVE
PARTICIPATION RATING: 3.9
Instructional materials must
engage the physical and mental activity of students during the learning
process.
F. TARGETED
INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES RATING: 3.5
Instructional materials should include
the strategies known to be successful for
teaching the learning outcomes targeted in the curriculum requirements.
Comments:
G. TARGETED
ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES RATING: 3.5
Instructional materials should
include assessment strategies known to be successful in determining how well
students have achieved the learning outcomes targeted in the curriculum
requirements.
Comments: Chapter Review at end of chapter; assessment manual.
TOTAL
LEARNING RATING: 3.5
3.5
OVERALL TOTAL RATING:
STRENGTHS:
· Lab activities are relevant and age-appropriate
· Excellent student handbook at back of text
· FCAT practice/Florida masters
· Modules available
· Mind jogger video
CONCERNS:
· Assessment program is somewhat weak.
OVERALL IMPRESSION:
Adequate program, but could be more
comprehensive. Lab activities in
abundance.