DIOCESE OF ORLANDO OFFICE OF SCHOOLS

Instructional Materials Summary

 

Name of Publisher:            McGraw Hill (Fla. Edition)

 

Subject Area:                      Science

 

Title of Textbook or Series:    McGraw Hill Science

 

Grade Levels:     K – 5                   Copyright:  2000                 Edition:

           

RATING KEY:   4-Superior 3-Good   2-Fair   1-Poor   0-Feature Not Present

                             NA- Not Applicable

OVERVIEW:­­­­­

 

A listing of program resources is available by visiting the publisher’s website: www.mhschool.com/science.

 

CONTENT                                                                                      

 

A.   ALIGNMENT WITH CURRICULUM REQUIREMENTS                                      RATING:    3.3

      Content must align with the diocesan standards.

 

Comments:  Curriculum aligns with Diocesan standards.

 

B.   LEVEL OF TREATMENT                                                                              RATING:     3.7

The level of complexity or difficulty of content must be appropriate for the standards, grade level, and student abilities.        

 

Comments:  Age appropriate at all levels.

 

C.    EXPERTISE FOR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT                                              RATING:     3.7

       Expertise in the content area and in education of the intended students must be reflected in the authors, reviewers, and sources.

 

Comments:  National Geographic co-authored the program.

 

D.    ACCURACY OF CONTENT                                                                         RATING:    3.8

       Content must be accurate in historical context and contemporary facts and concepts.

 

Comments:  Accuracy is excellent.

 

E.    CURRENTNESS OF CONTENT                                                                   RATING:     3.9

Content must be up-to-date for the academic discipline and the context in which the content is presented.

 

Comments:  Florida topics covered well.


 

F.    AUTHENTICITY OF CONTENT                                                                     RATING:   3.8

       Content should include problem-centered connections to life in a context that is meaningful to the `      students.

 

Comments: 

 

G.    MULTICULTURAL REPRESENTATION                                                         RATING:    3.0

       Portrayal of gender, ethnicity, age, work situations, and social groups must     include multicultural fairness and advocacy.

      

Comments:  “Cultural perspective” sections incorporated.

 

H.    HUMANITY AND COMPASSION                                                                  RATING:    3.0

Portrayal of the appropriate care and treatment of people and animals must include compassion, sympathy, and consideration of their needs.

 

Comments:  Correlates to Christian values.

 

                                                                        TOTAL CONTENT RATING:    3.4

 

PRESENTATION

 

A.    COMPREHENSIVENESS OF STUDENT AND TEACHER RESOURCES         RATING:    3.7

Resources must be complete enough to address the targeted learning outcomes without requiring the teacher to prepare additional teaching materials for the course.

 

       STUDENT RESOURCES                                         Individual Rating:   3.7

 

Comments:  Kindergarten – 6 Big Books, 6 activity notebooks; Grades 1 & 2 – Big Book or individual books, activity cards, picture cards;  Grades 3-5 -  Mind jogger videos, science newsroom (great); brain power, transparencies in student text and much more.

 

       TEACHER RESOURCES                                        Individual Rating:    3.7

 

Comments:  Test generator, some investigations on videotape, laminated Big Books, K-2

 

                       

B.    ALIGNMENT OF INSTRUCTIONAL COMPONENTS                                       RATING:    3.8

All components of the instructional package must align with each other, as well as with the curriculum.

 

Comments:  Correlates with McGraw Hill Reading; cross curricular projects outlined.

 

C.    ORGANIZATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS                                      RATING:    3.7

The structure and format of the materials must have enough order and clarity to allow students and teachers to access content and explicitly identify ideas and sequences.              

 

Comments:  Easily accessible materials.

 

D.    READABILITY OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS                                         RATING:   3.0

       Narrative and visuals should engage students in reading or listening.

 

Comments:  On grade level; vocabulary in context printed in blue.

 

E.    PACING OF CONTENT                                                                               RATING:    4.0

The amount of content presented at one time or the pace at which it is presented must be of a size or rate that allows students to perceive and understand it

 

Comments:  Good; inquiry learning activities extend daily pacing.

 

F.    EASE OF USE OF MATERIALS                                                                  RATING:    3.5

Both print and other media formats of instructional materials must be easy to use and replace and be durable enough for multiple uses over time.

 

Comments:  Great – easy to use; excellent handbook

 

 

                                                            TOTAL PRESENTATION RATING:     3.7

 

 

LEARNING

 

A.    MOTIVATIONAL STRATEGIES                                                                    RATING:   3.7

       Instructional materials must include features to maintain learner motivation.

 

Comments:  Various ability level suggestions throughout chapters.

 

B.    TEACHING A FEW “BIG IDEAS”                                                                  RATING:    4.0

       Instructional materials should thoroughly teach a few important ideas, concepts, or themes.

 

Comments:  Material is thoroughly presented.

 

C.    EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION                                                                             RATING:    3.7  Instructional materials must contain clear statements of information and outcomes.    

 

Comments:  Information is clearly presented.

 

D.    GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT                                                                        RATING:    3.6

Instructional materials must include guidance and support to help students safely and successfully become more independent learners and thinkers.

 

Comments:  Pupil addition on audiotape; formatting features for struggling readers; “Words to Know” cards for every chapter.

 

E.    ACTIVE PARTICIPATION                                                                            RATING:    3.9

Instructional materials must engage the physical and mental activity of students during the learning process. 

 

Comments:  “Extend Activity” cards and “Science Builder” cards

 

F.    TARGETED INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES                                                RATING:    3.5

       Instructional materials should include the strategies known to be successful   for teaching the learning outcomes targeted in the curriculum requirements.

 

Comments:


 

 

G.    TARGETED ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES                                                   RATING:    3.5

Instructional materials should include assessment strategies known to be successful in determining how well students have achieved the learning outcomes targeted in the curriculum requirements.

 

Comments:  Chapter Review at end of chapter; assessment manual.

 

 

                                                                        TOTAL LEARNING RATING:    3.5

                                                                                                                                   

   3.5

 
 


                                                                          OVERALL TOTAL RATING:

 

 

STRENGTHS:

 

·      Lab activities are relevant and age-appropriate

·      Excellent student handbook at back of text

·      FCAT practice/Florida masters

·      Modules available

·      Mind jogger video

 

 

CONCERNS:

 

·      Assessment program is somewhat weak.

 

 

OVERALL IMPRESSION:

 

Adequate program, but could be more comprehensive.  Lab activities in abundance.